Evaluating the information that you find is an important part of conducting research - especially sources you find on the open web. Here are some things to keep in mind when looking at information:
There are many different evaluation "tests" that can be used but the CRAAP Test from the California State University, Chico library provides a handy mnemonic and guide with questions to keep in mind while evaluating:
Consider using BEAM to think about how you might use a source in your writing or argument. What will a source help you do? How will you incorporate it into your writing?
The BEAM acronym stands for four possible categories that you can use to help you organize your thoughts about a source. Keep in mind that one source can fit into multiple categories or have multiple uses within your research and writing!
Sources which will help you lay the groundwork for your writing by helping you establish and contextualize your topic. These materials provide claims which are accepted as facts or "common knowledge" on a topic.
Examples: Encyclopedia articles, book overviews, news, reports, etc.
Source that offers a subject or information that you will analyze or interpret.
Examples: Literature, films, poems, artwork, music, data, video, first-person accounts, etc.
Sources that you will engage with where you may expand on, debate, agree, or refute with the claims or information provided in the source.
Examples: Scholarly articles, books, literary criticism, etc.
Source that can provide concepts, theories, procedures, techniques, perspectives, or methods that you can use in your work.
Examples: Articles or books that provide a methodology, encyclopedia, philosophical or theoretical texts
Adapted from:
Bizup, J. (2008). BEAM: A rhetorical vocabulary for teaching research-based writing. Rhetoric Review, 27(1): 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350190701738858
Bizup, J., Cherry, M., Chirindo, K., Gray, R.V., Haag, A., Halasek, K., Liss, K., & Rubick, K. (2019). Using BEAM to integrate information literacy and writing: A framework with cases. In Teaching​ Information Literacy and Writing Studies (p. 67–). Purdue University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15wxqwx.10